Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 16 Jun 2020 14:20:10 +0200 | From | Cornelia Huck <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] s390: virtio: let arch accept devices without IOMMU feature |
| |
On Tue, 16 Jun 2020 12:52:50 +0200 Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> On 2020-06-16 11:52, Halil Pasic wrote: > > On Mon, 15 Jun 2020 14:39:24 +0200 > > Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> >> @@ -162,6 +163,11 @@ bool force_dma_unencrypted(struct device *dev) > >> return is_prot_virt_guest(); > >> } > >> > >> +int arch_needs_iommu_platform(struct virtio_device *dev) > > > > Maybe prefixing the name with virtio_ would help provide the > > proper context. > > The virtio_dev makes it obvious and from the virtio side it should be > obvious that the arch is responsible for this. > > However if nobody has something against I change it.
arch_needs_virtio_iommu_platform()?
> > > > >> +{ > >> + return is_prot_virt_guest(); > >> +} > >> + > >> /* protected virtualization */ > >> static void pv_init(void) > >> {
| |