Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 16 Jun 2020 08:12:17 +0100 | From | Lee Jones <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] mfd: sprd: get subdevices from DT instead for SC27XX SPI |
| |
On Mon, 15 Jun 2020, Baolin Wang wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 11:47 AM Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > From: Chunyan Zhang <chunyan.zhang@unisoc.com> > > > > SC27XX-SPI added subdevices according to a pre-defined mfd_cell array, > > no matter these devices were really included on board. So with this > > patch we switch to a new way of detecting subdevices which are > > defined in the devicetree. > > > > Signed-off-by: Chunyan Zhang <chunyan.zhang@unisoc.com> > > --- > > drivers/mfd/sprd-sc27xx-spi.c | 102 +++++++++++----------------------- > > 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 71 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/sprd-sc27xx-spi.c b/drivers/mfd/sprd-sc27xx-spi.c > > index 33336cde4724..aa3daa0cfcf5 100644 > > --- a/drivers/mfd/sprd-sc27xx-spi.c > > +++ b/drivers/mfd/sprd-sc27xx-spi.c > > @@ -93,73 +93,6 @@ enum usb_charger_type sprd_pmic_detect_charger_type(struct device *dev) > > } > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sprd_pmic_detect_charger_type); > > > > -static const struct mfd_cell sprd_pmic_devs[] = { > > - { > > - .name = "sc27xx-wdt", > > - .of_compatible = "sprd,sc2731-wdt", > > - }, { > > - .name = "sc27xx-rtc", > > - .of_compatible = "sprd,sc2731-rtc", > > - }, { > > - .name = "sc27xx-charger", > > - .of_compatible = "sprd,sc2731-charger", > > - }, { > > - .name = "sc27xx-chg-timer", > > - .of_compatible = "sprd,sc2731-chg-timer", > > - }, { > > - .name = "sc27xx-fast-chg", > > - .of_compatible = "sprd,sc2731-fast-chg", > > - }, { > > - .name = "sc27xx-chg-wdt", > > - .of_compatible = "sprd,sc2731-chg-wdt", > > - }, { > > - .name = "sc27xx-typec", > > - .of_compatible = "sprd,sc2731-typec", > > - }, { > > - .name = "sc27xx-flash", > > - .of_compatible = "sprd,sc2731-flash", > > - }, { > > - .name = "sc27xx-eic", > > - .of_compatible = "sprd,sc2731-eic", > > - }, { > > - .name = "sc27xx-efuse", > > - .of_compatible = "sprd,sc2731-efuse", > > - }, { > > - .name = "sc27xx-thermal", > > - .of_compatible = "sprd,sc2731-thermal", > > - }, { > > - .name = "sc27xx-adc", > > - .of_compatible = "sprd,sc2731-adc", > > - }, { > > - .name = "sc27xx-audio-codec", > > - .of_compatible = "sprd,sc2731-audio-codec", > > - }, { > > - .name = "sc27xx-regulator", > > - .of_compatible = "sprd,sc2731-regulator", > > - }, { > > - .name = "sc27xx-vibrator", > > - .of_compatible = "sprd,sc2731-vibrator", > > - }, { > > - .name = "sc27xx-keypad-led", > > - .of_compatible = "sprd,sc2731-keypad-led", > > - }, { > > - .name = "sc27xx-bltc", > > - .of_compatible = "sprd,sc2731-bltc", > > - }, { > > - .name = "sc27xx-fgu", > > - .of_compatible = "sprd,sc2731-fgu", > > - }, { > > - .name = "sc27xx-7sreset", > > - .of_compatible = "sprd,sc2731-7sreset", > > - }, { > > - .name = "sc27xx-poweroff", > > - .of_compatible = "sprd,sc2731-poweroff", > > - }, { > > - .name = "sc27xx-syscon", > > - .of_compatible = "sprd,sc2731-syscon", > > - }, > > -}; > > - > > static int sprd_pmic_spi_write(void *context, const void *data, size_t count) > > { > > struct device *dev = context; > > @@ -205,6 +138,35 @@ static const struct regmap_config sprd_pmic_config = { > > .max_register = 0xffff, > > }; > > > > +static int sprd_pmic_add_subdevices(struct device *dev, int id, > > + struct irq_domain *domain) > > +{ > > + int ret = 0; > > + struct device_node *child, *parent = dev->of_node; > > + struct mfd_cell cell = {0}; > > + const char *comp; > > + unsigned int prefix_len = strlen("sprd,"); > > + char buf[30]; > > + > > + for_each_child_of_node(parent, child) { > > + comp = of_get_property(child, "compatible", NULL); > > + if (!comp || strncmp("sprd,", comp, prefix_len)) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + > > + memcpy(buf, comp, strlen(comp) + 1); > > + cell.of_compatible = buf; > > + cell.name = buf + prefix_len; > > I feel it is a little hackish, you can create any device nodes from DT > even the PMIC does not support. > > I am not sure the problem caused by the original method, you can use > the compatible string to be compatible with different PMICs, such as > SC2730 ADC: > compatible = "sprd,sc2731-adc", "sprd,sc2730-adc"; > > Moreover I think you can add the "sprd,sc2730-xxx" compatible string > for the mfd_cell in this driver if you are sure we want to support > SC2730 PMIC.
Why not just use of_platform_populate()?
> > + > > + ret = devm_mfd_add_devices(dev, id, &cell, 1, NULL, 0, domain); > > + if (ret) { > > + pr_err("devm_mfd_add_devices return fail ret=%d\n", ret); > > + break; > > + } > > + } > > + > > + return ret; > > +} > > + > > static int sprd_pmic_probe(struct spi_device *spi) > > { > > struct sprd_pmic *ddata; > > @@ -263,10 +225,8 @@ static int sprd_pmic_probe(struct spi_device *spi) > > return ret; > > } > > > > - ret = devm_mfd_add_devices(&spi->dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO, > > - sprd_pmic_devs, ARRAY_SIZE(sprd_pmic_devs), > > - NULL, 0, > > - regmap_irq_get_domain(ddata->irq_data)); > > + ret = sprd_pmic_add_subdevices(&spi->dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO, > > + regmap_irq_get_domain(ddata->irq_data)); > > if (ret) { > > dev_err(&spi->dev, "Failed to register device %d\n", ret); > > return ret; > > > >
-- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
| |