lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jun]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRE: [PATCH v2 2/2] scsi: ufs: Add trace event for UIC commands
Date
>         /* Write UIC Cmd */
> ufshcd_writel(hba, uic_cmd->command & COMMAND_OPCODE_MASK,
> REG_UIC_COMMAND);
> @@ -4825,11 +4847,15 @@ static irqreturn_t ufshcd_uic_cmd_compl(struct
> ufs_hba *hba, u32 intr_status)
> ufshcd_get_uic_cmd_result(hba);
> hba->active_uic_cmd->argument3 =
> ufshcd_get_dme_attr_val(hba);
> + ufshcd_add_uic_command_trace(hba, hba->active_uic_cmd,
> + "complete");
> complete(&hba->active_uic_cmd->done);
> retval = IRQ_HANDLED;
> }
>
> if ((intr_status & UFSHCD_UIC_PWR_MASK) && hba->uic_async_done) {
> + ufshcd_add_uic_command_trace(hba, hba->active_uic_cmd,
> + "complete");
> complete(hba->uic_async_done);
> retval = IRQ_HANDLED;


Why not call ufshcd_add_uic_command_trace once if retval == IRQ_HANDLED?
Is it that the exact timestamp?

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-06-15 09:14    [W:0.079 / U:0.068 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site