Messages in this thread |  | | Subject | Re: [RFC,net-next, 2/5] vrf: track associations between VRF devices and tables | From | David Ahern <> | Date | Sat, 13 Jun 2020 18:34:25 -0600 |
| |
On 6/13/20 4:53 PM, Andrea Mayer wrote: > Hi Stephen, > thanks for your questions. > > On Sat, 13 Jun 2020 12:28:59 -0700 > Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> wrote: > >>> + >>> + * Conversely, shared_table is decreased when a vrf is de-associated >>> + * from a table with exactly two associated vrfs. >>> + */ >>> + int shared_tables; >> >> Should this be unsigned? >> Should it be a fixed size? > > Yes. I think an u32 would be reasonable for the shared_table. > What do you think? >
u32 or unsigned int is fine.
|  |