Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sun, 14 Jun 2020 00:53:53 +0200 | From | Andrea Mayer <> | Subject | Re: [RFC,net-next, 2/5] vrf: track associations between VRF devices and tables |
| |
Hi Stephen, thanks for your questions.
On Sat, 13 Jun 2020 12:28:59 -0700 Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> wrote:
> > + > > + * Conversely, shared_table is decreased when a vrf is de-associated > > + * from a table with exactly two associated vrfs. > > + */ > > + int shared_tables; > > Should this be unsigned? > Should it be a fixed size?
Yes. I think an u32 would be reasonable for the shared_table. What do you think?
Andrea
|  |