lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jun]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [v2] proc/fd: Remove unnecessary variable initialisations in seq_show()
From
Date
>> The presented suggestions trigger different views by involved contributors.
>
> Most of the views I've heard are "Markus, go away".
> Do you not hear these views?

I notice also this kind of feedback.
The clarification is still evolving for these concerns and communication difficulties.

I suggest to take another look at published software development activities.


>> In which directions can the desired clarification evolve?
>
> You could try communicating in a way that the rest of us do.

I got also used to some communication styles.
I am curious to find the differences out which hinder to achieve a better
common understanding.


> For example, instead of saying something weird about "collateral evolution"
> you could say "I think there's a similar bug here".

* Why do you repeat this topic here?

* Do try to distract from implementation details which were pointed out
by two developers for this patch?


>> How do you think about further function design alternatives?
>
> Could you repeat that in German? I don't know what you mean.

I imagine that you could know affected software aspects better.

Regards,
Markus

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-06-12 20:44    [W:0.076 / U:1.236 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site