lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jun]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 1/2] hugetlb: use f_mode & FMODE_HUGETLBFS to identify hugetlbfs files
On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 05:46:43PM -0700, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> The routine is_file_hugepages() checks f_op == hugetlbfs_file_operations
> to determine if the file resides in hugetlbfs. This is problematic when
> the file is on a union or overlay. Instead, define a new file mode
> FMODE_HUGETLBFS which is set when a hugetlbfs file is opened. The mode
> can easily be copied to other 'files' derived from the original hugetlbfs
> file.
>
> With this change hugetlbfs_file_operations can be static as it should be.
>
> There is also a (duplicate) set of shm file operations used for the routine
> is_file_shm_hugepages(). Instead of setting/using special f_op's, just
> propagate the FMODE_HUGETLBFS mode. This means is_file_shm_hugepages() and
> the duplicate f_ops can be removed.
>
> While cleaning things up, change the name of is_file_hugepages() to
> is_file_hugetlbfs(). The term hugepages is a bit ambiguous.

I was going to have objections to this before I read it more carefully
and realised that the "shm" here is sysvipc and doesn't have anything
to do with the huge page support in shmfs.

> A subsequent patch will propagate FMODE_HUGETLBFS in overlayfs.
>
> Suggested-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>

Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>

I might have suggested splitting the rename of is_file_hugetlbfs() from
the rest of this patch, but I wouldn't resend to change that.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-06-12 03:53    [W:0.096 / U:0.180 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site