lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jun]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 1/3] capabilities: Introduce CAP_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE
On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 06:14:27PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 09:06:27AM -0700, Andrei Vagin wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 09:44:22AM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 08:42:21PM -0700, Andrei Vagin wrote:
...
> > > > PTRACE_O_SUSPEND_SECCOMP is needed for C/R and it is protected by
> > > > CAP_SYS_ADMIN too.
> > >
> > > This is currently capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) (init_ns capable) why is it
> > > safe to allow unprivileged users to suspend security policies? That
> > > sounds like a bad idea.
> >
...
> > I don't suggest to remove or
> > downgrade this capability check. The patch allows all c/r related
> > operations if the current has CAP_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE.
> >
> > So in this case the check:
> > if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
> > return -EPERM;
> >
> > will be converted in:
> > if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) && !capable(CAP_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE))
> > return -EPERM;
>
> Yeah, I got that but what's the goal here? Isn't it that you want to
> make it safe to install the criu binary with the CAP_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE
> fscap set so that unprivileged users can restore their own processes
> without creating a new user namespace or am I missing something? The
> use-cases in the cover-letter make it sound like that's what this is
> leading up to:
> > > > > * Checkpoint/Restore in an HPC environment in combination with a resource
> > > > > manager distributing jobs where users are always running as non-root.
> > > > > There is a desire to provide a way to checkpoint and restore long running
> > > > > jobs.
> > > > > * Container migration as non-root
> > > > > * We have been in contact with JVM developers who are integrating
> > > > > CRIU into a Java VM to decrease the startup time. These checkpoint/restore
> > > > > applications are not meant to be running with CAP_SYS_ADMIN.
>
> But maybe I'm just misunderstanding crucial bits (likely (TM)).

I think you understand this right. The goal is to make it possible to
use C/R functionality for unprivileged processes. And for me, here are
two separate tasks. The first one is how to allow unprivileged users to
use C/R from the root user namespace. This is what we discuss here.

And another one is how to allow to use C/R functionality from a non-root
user namespaces. The second task is about downgrading capable to
ns_capable for map_files and PTRACE_O_SUSPEND_SECCOMP.

Thanks,
Andrei

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-06-10 10:00    [W:0.092 / U:0.432 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site