lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jun]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: linux-next: manual merge of the ipsec-next tree with Linus' tree
Hi Dave,

On Mon, 11 May 2020 13:00:15 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the ipsec-next tree got conflicts in:
>
> net/ipv4/xfrm4_output.c
> net/ipv6/xfrm6_output.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 0c922a4850eb ("xfrm: Always set XFRM_TRANSFORMED in xfrm{4,6}_output_finish")
>
> from Linus' tree and commit:
>
> 2ab6096db2f1 ("xfrm: remove output_finish indirection from xfrm_state_afinfo")
>
> from the ipsec-next tree.
>
> I fixed it up (I used the latter versions of these files and then added
> the following patch) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed
> as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should
> be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for
> merging. You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer
> of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
>
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 12:57:24 +1000
> Subject: [PATCH] xfrm: merge fixup for "remove output_finish indirection from xfrm_state_afinfo"
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> ---
> net/xfrm/xfrm_output.c | 4 ----
> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_output.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_output.c
> index 886a9b284b3a..0f4b3a5e02ba 100644
> --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_output.c
> +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_output.c
> @@ -574,16 +574,12 @@ int xfrm_output(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> switch (x->outer_mode.family) {
> case AF_INET:
> memset(IPCB(skb), 0, sizeof(*IPCB(skb)));
> -#ifdef CONFIG_NETFILTER
> IPCB(skb)->flags |= IPSKB_XFRM_TRANSFORMED;
> -#endif
> break;
> case AF_INET6:
> memset(IP6CB(skb), 0, sizeof(*IP6CB(skb)));
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_NETFILTER
> IP6CB(skb)->flags |= IP6SKB_XFRM_TRANSFORMED;
> -#endif
> break;
> }
>

It looks like this merge resolution fix up was missed when the
ipsec-next tree was merged into the net-next tree.

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-06-02 01:21    [W:0.050 / U:0.204 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site