lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [May]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    Patch in this message
    /
    From
    Date
    Subject[PATCH 2/6] exec: Fix spelling of search_binary_handler in a comment

    Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
    ---
    fs/exec.c | 2 +-
    1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

    diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
    index d4387bc92292..82106241ed53 100644
    --- a/fs/exec.c
    +++ b/fs/exec.c
    @@ -1296,7 +1296,7 @@ void __set_task_comm(struct task_struct *tsk, const char *buf, bool exec)
    * Calling this is the point of no return. None of the failures will be
    * seen by userspace since either the process is already taking a fatal
    * signal (via de_thread() or coredump), or will have SEGV raised
    - * (after exec_mmap()) by search_binary_handlers (see below).
    + * (after exec_mmap()) by search_binary_handler (see below).
    */
    int begin_new_exec(struct linux_binprm * bprm)
    {
    --
    2.20.1
    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2020-05-08 20:48    [W:4.847 / U:0.108 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site