lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [May]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 09/17] mmc: sdhci-msm: Fix error handling for dev_pm_opp_of_add_table()
On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 at 16:09, Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>
>
> On 4/28/2020 11:59 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 at 15:39, Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Even though specifying OPP's in device tree is optional, ignoring all errors
> >> reported by dev_pm_opp_of_add_table() means we can't distinguish between a
> >> missing OPP table and a wrong/buggy OPP table. While missing OPP table
> >> (dev_pm_opp_of_add_table() returns a -ENODEV in such case) can be ignored,
> >> a wrong/buggy OPP table in device tree should make the driver error out.
> >>
> >> while we fix that, lets also fix the variable names for opp/opp_table to
> >> avoid confusion and name them opp_table/has_opp_table instead.
> >>
> >> Suggested-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <matthias@chromium.org>
> >> Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org>
> >> Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
> >> Cc: Pradeep P V K <ppvk@codeaurora.org>
> >> Cc: Veerabhadrarao Badiganti <vbadigan@codeaurora.org>
> >> Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
> >
> > Is this a standalone patch that I queue up via my mmc tree?
>
> Hi Ulf, yes, its a standalone patch which applies on top of the one
> you already have in your tree. No other dependencies.

Thanks for confirming! Perhaps next time you could add this
information as part of a description to the patch (where we usually
add patch version information).

Anyway, applied for next!

[...]

Kind regards
Uffe

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-05-05 13:33    [W:0.112 / U:0.096 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site