lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [May]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Fix off-by-one error in clock choice
Date
If the rate in our table is _equal_ to the rate we want then it's OK
to pick it. It doesn't need to be greater than the one we want.

Fixes: a095f15c00e2 ("drm/bridge: add support for sn65dsi86 bridge driver")
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
---

drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
index 6ad688b320ae..be000b0ca56b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
@@ -475,7 +475,7 @@ static int ti_sn_bridge_calc_min_dp_rate_idx(struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata)
1000 * pdata->dp_lanes * DP_CLK_FUDGE_DEN);

for (i = 1; i < ARRAY_SIZE(ti_sn_bridge_dp_rate_lut) - 1; i++)
- if (ti_sn_bridge_dp_rate_lut[i] > dp_rate_mhz)
+ if (ti_sn_bridge_dp_rate_lut[i] >= dp_rate_mhz)
break;

return i;
--
2.26.2.526.g744177e7f7-goog
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-05-05 06:32    [W:0.239 / U:0.024 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site