lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [May]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [patch V4 part 1 19/36] x86/entry: Exclude low level entry code from sanitizing
On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 10:13 AM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
>
> The sanitizers are not really applicable to the fragile low level entry
> code. code. Entry code needs to carefully setup a normal 'runtime'
> environment.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> ---
> arch/x86/entry/Makefile | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> --- a/arch/x86/entry/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/x86/entry/Makefile
> @@ -3,6 +3,14 @@
> # Makefile for the x86 low level entry code
> #
>
> +KASAN_SANITIZE := n
> +UBSAN_SANITIZE := n
> +KCOV_INSTRUMENT := n
> +
> +CFLAGS_REMOVE_common.o = $(CC_FLAGS_FTRACE) -fstack-protector -fstack-protector-strong
> +CFLAGS_REMOVE_syscall_32.o = $(CC_FLAGS_FTRACE) -fstack-protector -fstack-protector-strong
> +CFLAGS_REMOVE_syscall_64.o = $(CC_FLAGS_FTRACE) -fstack-protector -fstack-protector-strong

Is this necessary for syscall_*.o? They just contain the syscall
tables (ie. data).

--
Brian Gerst

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-05-05 22:40    [W:0.951 / U:0.092 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site