lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [May]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] net: rtw88: fix an issue about leak system resources
From
Date
>>> the related system resources were not released when pci_iomap() return
>>> error in the rtw_pci_io_mapping() function. add pci_release_regions() to
>>> fix it.
>>
>> How do you think about a wording variant like the following?
>>
>> Subject:
>> [PATCH v2] net: rtw88: Complete exception handling in rtw_pci_io_mapping()
>>
>> Change description:
>> A call of the function “pci_request_regions” can fail here.
>> The corresponding system resources were not released then.
>> Thus add a call of the function “pci_release_regions”.
>>
>>
> Markus, I think my commit comments is a sufficiently clear description
> for this patch.

I got an other impression for specific aspects.


> Someone has told me not to send commit comments again and again
> when it is enough clear.

My patch review tries should give you hints where I noticed wording weaknesses.
The corresponding change tolerance can vary by involved contributors.


> Because it only wastes the precious time of the maintainer
> and very very little help for patch improvement.

I hope that also your commit messages will improve.


> BTW, In the past week, you asked me to change the commit comments in my
> 6 patches like this one. Let me return to the essence of patch, point
> out the code problems and better solutions will be more popular.

I would appreciate if various update suggestions would become nicer somehow.

Regards,
Markus

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-05-04 17:02    [W:0.090 / U:0.016 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site