Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [GIT PULL] sh: remove sh5 support | From | John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <> | Date | Sun, 31 May 2020 10:03:13 +0200 |
| |
On 5/31/20 5:20 AM, Rob Landley wrote: > On 5/30/20 3:08 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: >> On 5/29/20 7:53 PM, Rich Felker wrote: >>> Frustratingly, I _still_ don't have an official tree on kernel.org for >>> the purpose of being the canonical place for linux-next to pull from, >>> due to policies around pgp keys and nobody following up on signing >>> mine. This is all really silly since there are ridiculously many >>> independent channels I could cryptographically validate identity >>> through with vanishing probability that they're all compromised. For >>> the time being I'll reactivate my repo on git.musl-libc.org. >> >> May I suggest to pick up these patches, for example? There might be >> more I missed, but getting these merged should already help a lot with >> the clean-up of arch/sh. > > Does that include the 2 fixes to build with current binutils I made puppy eyes > about last -rc7 (in march)? > > https://marc.info/?l=linux-sh&m=158544749818664&w=2 Yes, listed as "[PATCH 1/2] arch/sh: vmlinux.scr".
@Rich: Do you think you can merge all those fixes in your local tree within the next days and send a PR to Linus?
Otherwise, I can volunteer to become a third maintainer for arch/sh as I have the hardware for testing and can accept patches and send PRs.
We shouldn't let contributors to arch/sh wait for too long.
Adrian
-- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaubitz@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de `- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
| |