lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [May]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] ARM: dts: imx53: ppd: alarm LEDs use kernel LED interface
Hi,

ping?

-- Sebastian

On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 02:44:23PM +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 11:32:26AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > On Thu 2020-04-16 16:51:23, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> > > From: Ian Ray <ian.ray@ge.com>
> > >
> > > Use kernel LED interface for the alarm LEDs.
> >
> > Could we get these changes cced to LED maintainers?
>
> Sorry, you are not turning up via get_maintainer.pl and usually
> subsystem maintainers are not CC'd for every DT device instance.
> E.g. I do not want to be always CC'd for DT board file containing
> a battery/charger. I'm quite surprised you want to be CC'd for
> them, just looking at ARM DT files there are over 1000 instances
> of leds.
>
> > > + alarm1 {
> > > + label = "alarm:red";
> > > + gpios = <&gpio7 3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> > > + };
> >
> > So... What is function of these leds, and can we get naming more
> > consistent with rest of the kernel?
>
> The device is a medical patient monitor and these are alarm LEDs
> informing about critical device or patient status. They are
> referenced by their color (those are discrete LEDs, not a
> multi-color one) basically everywhere. The only exception is
> "silenced", which means that audible alarm is surpressed. I
> don't think we have something comparable for any of those LEDs
> in the mainline tree.
>
> -- Sebastian
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-05-29 16:06    [W:0.082 / U:1.364 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site