[lkml]   [2020]   [May]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/4] exfat: redefine PBR as boot_sector
>> I'll make another small patch, OK?
> No, It make sense to make v3, because you have renamed the variables in
> boot_sector on this patch.


>> BTW
>> I have a concern about fs_name.
>> The exfat specification says that this field is "EXFAT".
>> I think it's a important field for determining the filesystem.
>> However, in this patch, I gave up checking this field.
>> Because there is no similar check in FATFS.
>> Do you know why Linux FATFS does not check this filed?
>> And, what do you think of checking this field?
> FATFS has the same field named "oem_name" and whatever is okay for its value.
> However, in case of exFAT, it is an important field to determine filesystem.
> I think it would be better to check this field for exFAT-fs.
> Would you like to contribute new patch for checking it?

I already have the code, so I'll add it to [PATCH 2/4 v3].


 \ /
  Last update: 2020-05-29 08:35    [W:0.132 / U:2.268 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site