lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [May]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 03/12] dt-bindings: i2c: Discard i2c-slave flag from the DW I2C example
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 1:00 AM Serge Semin
<Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> wrote:
>
> dtc currently doesn't support I2C_OWN_SLAVE_ADDRESS flag set in the
> i2c "reg" property. If it is the compiler will print a warning:

Shouldn't be dtc whatever tools fixed?

> Warning (i2c_bus_reg): /example-2/i2c@1120000/eeprom@64: I2C bus unit address format error, expected "40000064"
> Warning (i2c_bus_reg): /example-2/i2c@1120000/eeprom@64:reg: I2C address must be less than 10-bits, got "0x40000064"
>
> In order to silence dtc up let's discard the flag from the DW I2C DT
> binding example for now. Just revert this commit when dtc is fixed.

Doesn't sound like a good idea. If user happens in between of these
ping-pong change, how they will know this subtle issue?

--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-05-27 11:31    [W:0.221 / U:0.228 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site