Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 26 May 2020 17:01:01 +0200 | From | Michał Mirosław <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] mfd: tps65910: Correct power-off programming sequence |
| |
On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 10:26:43PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: > This patch fixes system shutdown on a devices that use TPS65910 as a > system's power controller. In accordance to the TPS65910 datasheet, the > PMIC's state-machine transitions into the OFF state only when DEV_OFF > bit of DEVCTRL_REG is set. The ON / SLEEP states also should be cleared, > otherwise PMIC won't get into a proper state on shutdown. Devices like > Nexus 7 tablet and Ouya game console are now shutting down properly.
The datasheets of 65910 and 65911 say that ON and SLP bits are cleared during OFF state. But I guess the hardware might work differently.
[...] > --- a/drivers/mfd/tps65910.c > +++ b/drivers/mfd/tps65910.c > @@ -440,8 +440,13 @@ static void tps65910_power_off(void) > DEVCTRL_PWR_OFF_MASK) < 0) > return; > > - tps65910_reg_clear_bits(tps65910, TPS65910_DEVCTRL, > - DEVCTRL_DEV_ON_MASK); > + if (tps65910_reg_clear_bits(tps65910, TPS65910_DEVCTRL, > + DEVCTRL_DEV_SLP_MASK) < 0) > + return; > + > + tps65910_reg_update_bits(tps65910, TPS65910_DEVCTRL, > + DEVCTRL_DEV_OFF_MASK | DEVCTRL_DEV_ON_MASK, > + DEVCTRL_DEV_OFF_MASK); > }
There is tps65910_reg_set_bits() at the start of function. I guess it doesn't work if your changes are needed. Maybe you can remove it?
I would also include your observations about the chip's behaviour in the commit message so it doesn't get "fixed" later.
Best Regards, Michał Mirosław
| |