Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 26 May 2020 21:57:20 +0000 | From | Wei Yang <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] bitops: use the same mechanism for get_count_order[_long] |
| |
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 10:04:57AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 09:59:58PM +0000, Wei Yang wrote: >> These two functions share the same logic. > >So, same comment. Please, add test first, make sure it works on current kernel, >then after your patch applied, and send it as a series, thanks! > >P.S. W/o test code looks good, but based on my experience I'm very suspicious >about "small" changes that may lead to big issues. Hope you understand my point. >
Sure, I see your point.
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> >> --- >> include/linux/bitops.h | 8 +++----- >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/include/linux/bitops.h b/include/linux/bitops.h >> index 5b5609e81a84..80703ef27aee 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/bitops.h >> +++ b/include/linux/bitops.h >> @@ -188,12 +188,10 @@ static inline unsigned fls_long(unsigned long l) >> >> static inline int get_count_order(unsigned int count) >> { >> - int order; >> + if (count == 0) >> + return -1; >> >> - order = fls(count) - 1; >> - if (count & (count - 1)) >> - order++; >> - return order; >> + return fls(--count); >> } >> >> /** >> -- >> 2.23.0 >> > >-- >With Best Regards, >Andy Shevchenko >
-- Wei Yang Help you, Help me
| |