lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [May]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] kvm/x86: don't expose MSR_IA32_UMWAIT_CONTROL unconditionally
From
Date
On 21/05/20 06:33, Xiaoyao Li wrote:
> I remember there is certainly some reason why we don't expose WAITPKG to
> guest by default.

That's a userspace policy decision. KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID should
still tell userspace that it's supported.

Paolo

> Tao, please help clarify it.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-05-21 10:26    [W:0.066 / U:0.556 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site