lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [May]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH V3 7/8] fs/ext4: Introduce DAX inode flag
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 04:11:38PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Tue 19-05-20 22:57:52, ira.weiny@intel.com wrote:
> > From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
> >
> > Add a flag to preserve FS_XFLAG_DAX in the ext4 inode.
> >
> > Set the flag to be user visible and changeable. Set the flag to be
> > inherited. Allow applications to change the flag at any time with the
> > exception of if VERITY or ENCRYPT is set.
> >
> > Disallow setting VERITY or ENCRYPT if DAX is set.
> >
> > Finally, on regular files, flag the inode to not be cached to facilitate
> > changing S_DAX on the next creation of the inode.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
>
> The patch looks good to me. You can add:
>
> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
>
> One comment below:
>
> > diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
> > index 5ba65eb0e2ef..be9713e898eb 100644
> > --- a/fs/ext4/super.c
> > +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
> > @@ -1323,6 +1323,9 @@ static int ext4_set_context(struct inode *inode, const void *ctx, size_t len,
> > if (WARN_ON_ONCE(IS_DAX(inode) && i_size_read(inode)))
> > return -EINVAL;
>
> AFAIU this check is here so that fscrypt_inherit_context() is able call us
> and we can clear S_DAX flag.

Basically yes that is true. It is IMO somewhat convoluted because I think ext4
probably could have prevented S_DAX from being set in __ext4_new_inode() in the
first place. But that is a clean up I was not prepared to make last night.

> So can't we rather move this below the
> EXT4_INODE_DAX check and change this to
>
> IS_DAX(inode) && !(inode->i_flags & I_NEW)
>
> ? Because as I'm reading the code now, this should never trigger?

I agree this should never trigger. But I don't see how the order of the checks
maters much. But changing this to !new is probably worth doing to make it
clear what we really mean here.

I think that is a follow on patch. In addition, if we don't set S_DAX at all
in __ext4_new_inode() this check could then be what I had originally with the warn on.

if (WARN_ON_ONCE(IS_DAX(inode)))
...

... because it would be considered a bug to be setting DAX on inodes which are
going to be encrypted..

Ira

Something like this: (compiled only)

commit 6cd5aed3cd9e2c10e3fb7c6dd23918580532f256 (HEAD -> lck-4071-b13-v4)
Author: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
Date: Wed May 20 11:32:50 2020 -0700

RFC: do not set S_DAX on an inode which is going to be encrypted

diff --git a/fs/ext4/ialloc.c b/fs/ext4/ialloc.c
index 7941c140723f..be80cb639d74 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/ialloc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/ialloc.c
@@ -844,6 +844,9 @@ struct inode *__ext4_new_inode(handle_t *handle, struct inode *dir,
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
ei = EXT4_I(inode);

+ if (encrypt)
+ ext4_set_inode_flag(inode, EXT4_INODE_ENCRYPT);
+
/*
* Initialize owners and quota early so that we don't have to account
* for quota initialization worst case in standard inode creating
@@ -1165,6 +1168,7 @@ struct inode *__ext4_new_inode(handle_t *handle, struct inode *dir,
err = fscrypt_inherit_context(dir, inode, handle, true);
if (err)
goto fail_free_drop;
+ ext4_clear_inode_state(inode, EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA);
}

if (!(ei->i_flags & EXT4_EA_INODE_FL)) {
diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
index be9713e898eb..099b87864f55 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
@@ -1320,7 +1320,10 @@ static int ext4_set_context(struct inode *inode, const void *ctx, size_t len,
if (inode->i_ino == EXT4_ROOT_INO)
return -EPERM;

- if (WARN_ON_ONCE(IS_DAX(inode) && i_size_read(inode)))
+ /* S_DAX should never be set here because encryption is not compatible
+ * with DAX
+ */
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(IS_DAX(inode)))
return -EINVAL;

if (ext4_test_inode_flag(inode, EXT4_INODE_DAX))
@@ -1337,22 +1340,11 @@ static int ext4_set_context(struct inode *inode, const void *ctx, size_t len,
* being set on an existing inode in its own transaction. Only in the
* latter case should the "retry on ENOSPC" logic be used.
*/
-
if (handle) {
res = ext4_xattr_set_handle(handle, inode,
EXT4_XATTR_INDEX_ENCRYPTION,
EXT4_XATTR_NAME_ENCRYPTION_CONTEXT,
ctx, len, 0);
- if (!res) {
- ext4_set_inode_flag(inode, EXT4_INODE_ENCRYPT);
- ext4_clear_inode_state(inode,
- EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA);
- /*
- * Update inode->i_flags - S_ENCRYPTED will be enabled,
- * S_DAX may be disabled
- */
- ext4_set_inode_flags(inode, false);
- }
return res;
}
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-05-20 20:35    [W:2.486 / U:0.012 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site