lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [May]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] spi: Add Baikal-T1 System Boot SPI Controller driver
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 03:05:42AM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 10:25:06PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> > Yes, some flags should work here - the issue was that at least some
> > controllers may end up trying to do multiple SPI operations for one
> > spi-mem thing which will break if the chip select doesn't get changed to
> > correspond with what's going on.

> Ok. New SPI flag it is then. It will be something like this:
> + #define SPI_CONTROLLER_FLASH_SS BIT(6)

I'd rather use CS than SS (it's more common in the code).

> So, what do you think?

Should be fine, controllers that have an issue implementing just
shouldn't set the flag.

> > > > It's not clear to me that this hardware actually supports spi_mem in
> > > > hardware?

> > > SPI-mem operations are implemented by means of the EEPROM-read and Tx-only
> > > modes of the controller.

> > Sure, but those seem like normal SPI-level things rather than cases
> > where the hardware understands that it has a flash attached and is doing
> > flash specific things.

> No, hardware can't detect whether the flash is attached. This must be defined by
> the platform, like based on the DT sub-nodes.

This isn't about autodetection, it's about the abstraction level the
hardware is operating on - some hardware is able to generate flash
operations by itself (possibly with some help programming the opcodes
that are needed by a given flash), some hardware just works at the
bytestream level.

> > A very common case for this stuff is that
> > controllers have acceleration blocks for read and fall back on normal
> > SPI for writes and erases, that sounds like what's going on here.
>
> Well, yeah, they do provide some acceleration. EEPROM-read provides automatic
> write-cmd-dummy-data-then-read operations. But in this case the only thing we
> have to push into the SPI Tx FIFO is command and dummy bytes. The read operation

So it's a write then read but you have to program the write each time?
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-05-18 17:20    [W:0.073 / U:0.484 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site