Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 18 May 2020 13:16:19 +0530 | From | Viresh Kumar <> | Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] cpufreq: handle the return value of '.set_boost()' properly |
| |
On 18-05-20, 15:10, Xiongfeng Wang wrote: > 'freq_qos_update_request()' called by 'cpufreq_boost_set_sw()' reutrns 1 > when the effective constraint value of frequency QoS has changed. It's > not an error code. So handle the return value 1 of '.set_boost()' in > 'cpufreq_boost_trigger_state()' properly. > > Signed-off-by: Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com> > --- > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 5 ++++- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > index 4adac3a..bb6746e 100644 > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > @@ -2540,7 +2540,10 @@ int cpufreq_boost_trigger_state(int state) > write_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags); > > ret = cpufreq_driver->set_boost(state); > - if (ret) { > + if (ret == 1) { > + pr_debug("The effective constraint value of frequency QoS has changed.\n"); > + return 0; > + } else if (ret) {
Rafael, IMO it is better to pick patch from Sergey for this as this is implementation detail.
> write_lock_irqsave(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags); > cpufreq_driver->boost_enabled = !state; > write_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags); > -- > 1.7.12.4
-- viresh
| |