lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [May]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRE: [PATCH v5 00/18] Rework READ_ONCE() to improve codegen
Date
From: Peter Zijlstra
> Sent: 14 May 2020 15:25
..
> Exact same requirements, KASAN even has the data_race() problem through
> READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(), UBSAN doesn't and might be simpler because of it.

What happens if you implement READ_ONCE_NOCHECK() with an
asm() statement containing a memory load?

Is that enough to kill all the instrumentation?

David

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-05-15 15:56    [W:0.208 / U:0.472 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site