lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [May]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 2/6] dt-bindings: dma: dw: Add max burst transaction length property
On 15-05-20, 13:51, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 11:39:11AM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > On 12-05-20, 15:38, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 02:49:46PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> > > > On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 12:08:04PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 12:35:31AM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> > > > > > On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 12:01:38AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > > > > On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 11:05:28PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 02:12:42PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 01:53:00PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > > I leave it to Rob and Vinod.
> > > It won't break our case, so, feel free with your approach.
> >
> > I agree the DT is about describing the hardware and looks like value of
> > 1 is not allowed. If allowed it should be added..
>
> It's allowed at *run time*, it's illegal in *pre-silicon stage* when
> synthesizing the IP.

Then it should be added ..

--
~Vinod

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-05-15 12:57    [W:0.111 / U:1.192 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site