Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 14 May 2020 14:34:26 +0100 (BST) | From | "Maciej W. Rozycki" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] MIPS: update tlb even if pte entry has no change |
| |
On Thu, 14 May 2020, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> >> If there are two threads reading the same memory and tlb miss happens, > >> one thread fills pte entry, the other reads new pte value during page fault > >> handling. PTE value may be updated before page faul, so the process need > > > > Fault. > > And "needs". > > >> need update tlb still. > > Oh, and one "need" is enough. :-)
Hmm, "the process need update" looks right to me (compare "the process need not update") as "need" is used as a modal verb in this sentence. Alternatively "the process needs to update" could be used (with "need" as a main verb, and "to" then).
I'm not a native English speaker though, so I might be missing a usage subtlety here.
NB I'd be in favour of capitalising "PTE" and "TLB" consistently throughout though as the norm is with acronyms.
Maciej
| |