lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [May]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 2/2] powerpc/rtas: Implement reentrant rtas call
Date
Hi,

Leonardo Bras <leobras.c@gmail.com> writes:
> +/**
> + * rtas_call_reentrant() - Used for reentrant rtas calls
> + * @token: Token for desired reentrant RTAS call
> + * @nargs: Number of Input Parameters
> + * @nret: Number of Output Parameters
> + * @outputs: Array of outputs
> + * @...: Inputs for desired RTAS call
> + *
> + * According to LoPAR documentation, only "ibm,int-on", "ibm,int-off",
> + * "ibm,get-xive" and "ibm,set-xive" are currently reentrant.
> + * Reentrant calls need their own rtas_args buffer, so not using rtas.args, but
> + * PACA one instead.
> + *
> + * Return: -1 on error,
> + * First output value of RTAS call if (nret > 0),
> + * 0 otherwise,
> + */
> +
> +int rtas_call_reentrant(int token, int nargs, int nret, int *outputs, ...)
> +{
> + va_list list;
> + struct rtas_args *args;
> + int i;
> +
> + if (!rtas.entry || token == RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE)
> + return -1;
> +
> + /* We use the per-cpu (PACA) rtas args buffer */
> + args = &local_paca->reentrant_args;
> +
> + va_start(list, outputs);
> + va_rtas_call_unlocked(args, token, nargs, nret, list);
> + va_end(list);
> +
> + if (nret > 1 && outputs)
> + for (i = 0; i < nret - 1; ++i)
> + outputs[i] = be32_to_cpu(args->rets[i + 1]);

Doesn't this need to be more careful about preemption and exceptions?
I.e. the args structure in the paca needs to be protected from
concurrent use somehow, like any per-cpu data structure.

local_irq_save/restore while accessing local_paca->reentrant_args here
would be sufficient I think?

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-05-14 21:00    [W:0.060 / U:0.116 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site