lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [May]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v5 1/7] fs: introduce kernel_pread_file* support
From
Date
On Wed, 2020-05-13 at 11:53 -0700, Scott Branden wrote:
> Hi Mimi,
>
> On 2020-05-13 11:39 a.m., Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > [Cc'ing linux-security-module, linux-integrity]
> >
> > On Thu, 2020-05-07 at 17:27 -0700, Scott Branden wrote:
> >> Add kernel_pread_file* support to kernel to allow for partial read
> >> of files with an offset into the file. Existing kernel_read_file
> >> functions call new kernel_pread_file functions with offset=0 and
> >> flags=KERNEL_PREAD_FLAG_WHOLE.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Scott Branden <scott.branden@broadcom.com>
> >> ---
> > <snip>
> >
> >> @@ -941,14 +955,16 @@ int kernel_read_file(struct file *file, void **buf, loff_t *size,
> The checkpatch shows this as kernel_read_file when it is actually the
> new function kernel_pread_file.
> Please see the call to kernel_pread_file from kernel_read_file in the
> complete patch rather this snippet.
> >>
> >> if (bytes == 0)
> >> break;
> >> +
> >> + buf_pos += bytes;
> >> }
> >>
> >> - if (pos != i_size) {
> >> + if (pos != read_end) {
> >> ret = -EIO;
> >> goto out_free;
> >> }
> >>
> >> - ret = security_kernel_post_read_file(file, *buf, i_size, id);
> >> + ret = security_kernel_post_read_file(file, *buf, alloc_size, id);
> >> if (!ret)
> >> *size = pos;
> > Prior to the patch set that introduced this security hook, firmware
> > would be read twice, once for measuring/appraising the firmware and
> > again reading the file contents into memory.  Partial reads will break
> > both IMA's measuring the file and appraising the file signatures.
> The partial file read support is needed for request_firmware_into_buf
> from drivers.  The EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL is being removed so that
> there can be no abuse of the partial file read support.  Such file
> integrity checks are not needed for this use case.  The partial file
> (firmware image) is actually downloaded in portions and verified on the
> device it is loaded to.

It's all fine that the device will verify the firmware, but shouldn't
the kernel be able to also verify the firmware file signature it is
providing to the device, before providing it?

The device firmware is being downloaded piecemeal from somewhere and
won't be measured?

Mimi

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-05-13 21:04    [W:0.112 / U:0.124 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site