lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [May]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] powerpc/kvm: silence kmemleak false positives
Date
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> writes:
> On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 09:15:55PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> writes:
>> > kvmppc_pmd_alloc() and kvmppc_pte_alloc() allocate some memory but then
>> > pud_populate() and pmd_populate() will use __pa() to reference the newly
>> > allocated memory. The same is in xive_native_provision_pages().
>> >
>> > Since kmemleak is unable to track the physical memory resulting in false
>> > positives, silence those by using kmemleak_ignore().
>>
>> There is kmemleak_alloc_phys(), which according to the docs can be used
>> for tracking a phys address.
>
> This won't help. While kmemleak_alloc_phys() allows passing a physical
> address, it doesn't track physical address references to this object. It
> still expects VA pointing to it, otherwise the object would be reported
> as a leak.

OK, thanks for clarifying that.

> We currently only call this from the memblock code with a min_count of
> 0, meaning it will not be reported as a leak if no references are found.
>
> We don't have this issue with page tables on other architectures since
> most of them use whole page allocations which aren't tracked by
> kmemleak. These powerpc functions use kmem_cache_alloc() which would be
> tracked automatically by kmemleak. While we could add a phys alias to
> kmemleak (another search tree), I think the easiest is as per Qian's
> patch, just ignore those objects.

Agreed.

cheers

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-05-13 06:01    [W:1.117 / U:0.012 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site