lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [May]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [v2] memory/samsung: reduce unnecessary mutex lock area
From
Date


On 5/12/20 1:32 PM, Markus Elfring wrote:
>> Something like: 'memory/samsung: reduce protected code area in IRQ
>> handler' for the subject header would be better.
>> Then in the message explain (without 'maybe') that it will speed-up a
>> bit this IRQ processing and there is no need to protect return value
>> or printing.
>
> Do you tend to prefer smaller lock scopes for nicer run time characteristics?

Yes and I am probably not the only one. Of course it consumes time, to
make and test this kind of changes (so it must be in my current scope
of work).

Regards,
Lukasz

>
> Regards,
> Markus
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-05-12 14:48    [W:1.038 / U:2.036 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site