Messages in this thread | | | From | Dmitry Vyukov <> | Date | Tue, 12 May 2020 12:15:09 +0200 | Subject | Re: INFO: task hung in do_read_cache_page (3) |
| |
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 7:31 PM Mike Christie <mchristi@redhat.com> wrote: > > On 5/11/20 8:19 AM, syzbot wrote: > > syzbot has bisected this bug to: > > > > commit 2da22da573481cc4837e246d0eee4d518b3f715e > > Author: Mike Christie <mchristi@redhat.com> > > Date: Tue Aug 13 16:39:52 2019 +0000 > > > > nbd: fix zero cmd timeout handling v2 > > > > bisection log: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/bisect.txt?x=11d6ab14100000 > > start commit: e99332e7 gcc-10: mark more functions __init to avoid secti.. > > git tree: upstream > > final crash: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/report.txt?x=13d6ab14100000 > > console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=15d6ab14100000 > > kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=8a96cf498e199d8b > > dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=518c54e255b5031adde4 > > syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=146e45ec100000 > > C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=164444a4100000 > > > > Reported-by: syzbot+518c54e255b5031adde4@syzkaller.appspotmail.com > > Fixes: 2da22da57348 ("nbd: fix zero cmd timeout handling v2") > > > > For information about bisection process see: https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#bisection > > > > How do you adjust/modify what is expected from the test or what is > reported as an error? > > The patch added back behavior that got removed. With the patch we expect > the hung task warnings, because we specifically want to hold onto > running commands for longer than 120/hung_task_timeout seconds
Hi Mike,
All task hung messages are considered a kernel bug. So far this was always true as far as I can tell. Tasks that are blocked for any prolonged period should be killable.
| |