lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [May]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 8/9] KVM: x86, SVM: isolate vcpu->arch.dr6 from vmcb->save.dr6
On Sat, May 09, 2020 at 03:28:44PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 08/05/20 17:32, Peter Xu wrote:
> > On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 12:33:57AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >> On 07/05/20 21:28, Peter Xu wrote:
> >>>> - svm->vcpu.arch.dr6 = dr6;
> >>>> + WARN_ON(svm->vcpu.arch.switch_db_regs & KVM_DEBUGREG_WONT_EXIT);
> >>>> + svm->vcpu.arch.dr6 &= ~(DR_TRAP_BITS | DR6_RTM);
> >>>> + svm->vcpu.arch.dr6 |= dr6 & ~DR6_FIXED_1;
> >>> I failed to figure out what the above calculation is going to do...
> >>
> >> The calculation is merging the cause of the #DB with the guest DR6.
> >> It's basically the same effect as kvm_deliver_exception_payload.
> >
> > Shall we introduce a helper for both kvm_deliver_exception_payload and here
> > (e.g. kvm_merge_dr6)? Also, wondering whether this could be a bit easier to
> > follow by defining:
>
> It would make sense indeed but I plan to get rid of this in 5.9 (so in
> about a month), as explained in the comment.

OK. I thought it would be easy to change and verify when with the selftests,
however it's definitely ok to work upon it too. Thanks,

--
Peter Xu

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-05-11 18:16    [W:0.082 / U:0.252 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site