lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Apr]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/2] mm: Two small fixes for recent syzbot reports
On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 11:16 AM Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> Could I please direct attention back to my original question regarding
> the problems we've recently discovered in 4426e945df58 ("mm/gup: allow
> VM_FAULT_RETRY for multiple times") and 71335f37c5e8 ("mm/gup: allow to
> react to fatal signals")?

What earlier question? The "how could this happen" one?

Dmitry already answered that one - are you perhaps missing the emails?

linux-next has apparently not worked at all for over a month. So it
got no testing at all, and thus also all the gup patches got no
testing in linux-next.

Only when they hit my tree, did they start getting testing. Not
because my tree is the only thing getting tested, but because my tree
is the only tree that _works_.

Linus

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-04-09 20:55    [W:0.063 / U:0.096 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site