lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Apr]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH v1 6/6] platform/x86: intel_cht_int33fe: Fix spelling issues
Date
Fix spelling issues over the comments in the code.

Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
---
.../platform/x86/intel_cht_int33fe_typec.c | 20 +++++++++----------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_cht_int33fe_typec.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_cht_int33fe_typec.c
index e89defb33067..48638d1c56e5 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_cht_int33fe_typec.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_cht_int33fe_typec.c
@@ -6,14 +6,14 @@
*
* Some Intel Cherry Trail based device which ship with Windows 10, have
* this weird INT33FE ACPI device with a CRS table with 4 I2cSerialBusV2
- * resources, for 4 different chips attached to various i2c busses:
- * 1. The Whiskey Cove pmic, which is also described by the INT34D3 ACPI device
+ * resources, for 4 different chips attached to various I²C buses:
+ * 1. The Whiskey Cove PMIC, which is also described by the INT34D3 ACPI device
* 2. Maxim MAX17047 Fuel Gauge Controller
* 3. FUSB302 USB Type-C Controller
* 4. PI3USB30532 USB switch
*
* So this driver is a stub / pseudo driver whose only purpose is to
- * instantiate i2c-clients for chips 2 - 4, so that standard i2c drivers
+ * instantiate I²C clients for chips 2 - 4, so that standard I²C drivers
* for these chips can bind to the them.
*/

@@ -29,11 +29,11 @@
#include "intel_cht_int33fe_common.h"

/*
- * Grrr I severly dislike buggy BIOS-es. At least one BIOS enumerates
+ * Grrr, I severely dislike buggy BIOS-es. At least one BIOS enumerates
* the max17047 both through the INT33FE ACPI device (it is right there
* in the resources table) as well as through a separate MAX17047 device.
*
- * These helpers are used to work around this by checking if an i2c-client
+ * These helpers are used to work around this by checking if an I²C client
* for the max17047 has already been registered.
*/
static int cht_int33fe_check_for_max17047(struct device *dev, void *data)
@@ -235,9 +235,9 @@ cht_int33fe_register_max17047(struct device *dev, struct cht_int33fe_data *data)

i2c_for_each_dev(&max17047, cht_int33fe_check_for_max17047);
if (max17047) {
- /* Pre-existing i2c-client for the max17047, add device-props */
+ /* Pre-existing I²C client for the max17047, add device properties */
set_secondary_fwnode(&max17047->dev, fwnode);
- /* And re-probe to get the new device-props applied. */
+ /* And re-probe to get the new device properties applied */
ret = device_reprobe(&max17047->dev);
if (ret)
dev_warn(dev, "Reprobing max17047 error: %d\n", ret);
@@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ int cht_int33fe_typec_probe(struct cht_int33fe_data *data)
* must be registered before the fusb302 is instantiated, otherwise
* it will end up with a dummy-regulator.
* Note "cht_wc_usb_typec_vbus" comes from the regulator_init_data
- * which is defined in i2c-cht-wc.c from where the bq24292i i2c-client
+ * which is defined in i2c-cht-wc.c from where the bq24292i I²C client
* gets instantiated. We use regulator_get_optional here so that we
* don't end up getting a dummy-regulator ourselves.
*/
@@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ int cht_int33fe_typec_probe(struct cht_int33fe_data *data)
}
regulator_put(regulator);

- /* The FUSB302 uses the irq at index 1 and is the only irq user */
+ /* The FUSB302 uses the IRQ at index 1 and is the only IRQ user */
fusb302_irq = acpi_dev_gpio_irq_get(ACPI_COMPANION(dev), 1);
if (fusb302_irq < 0) {
if (fusb302_irq != -EPROBE_DEFER)
@@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ int cht_int33fe_typec_probe(struct cht_int33fe_data *data)
if (ret)
return ret;

- /* Work around BIOS bug, see comment on cht_int33fe_check_for_max17047 */
+ /* Work around BIOS bug, see comment on cht_int33fe_check_for_max17047() */
ret = cht_int33fe_register_max17047(dev, data);
if (ret)
goto out_remove_nodes;
--
2.25.1
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-04-08 18:11    [W:0.088 / U:1.164 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site