lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Apr]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH net-next v3 1/2] ethtool: provide UAPI for PHY master/slave configuration.
Hi Andrew,

On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 08:16:14PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 09:53:07AM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
>
> Hi Oleksij
>
> Sorry for taking a while to review this. I was busy fixing the FEC
> driver which i broke :-(

Not problem.
Interesting, what is wrong with FEC? We use it a lot.

> > --- a/Documentation/networking/ethtool-netlink.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/networking/ethtool-netlink.rst
> > @@ -399,6 +399,8 @@ Kernel response contents:
> > ``ETHTOOL_A_LINKMODES_PEER`` bitset partner link modes
> > ``ETHTOOL_A_LINKMODES_SPEED`` u32 link speed (Mb/s)
> > ``ETHTOOL_A_LINKMODES_DUPLEX`` u8 duplex mode
> > + ``ETHTOOL_A_LINKMODES_MASTER_SLAVE_CFG`` u8 Master/slave port mode
> > + ``ETHTOOL_A_LINKMODES_MASTER_SLAVE_STATE`` u8 Master/slave port mode
> > ==================================== ====== ==========================
>
> I've not used Sphinx for a while. But it used to be, tables had to be
> correctly aligned. I think you need to pad the other rows with spaces.
>
> Also, the comments should differ. The first is how we want it
> configured, the second is the current state.

ok

> >
> > For ``ETHTOOL_A_LINKMODES_OURS``, value represents advertised modes and mask
> > @@ -421,6 +423,7 @@ Request contents:
> > ``ETHTOOL_A_LINKMODES_PEER`` bitset partner link modes
> > ``ETHTOOL_A_LINKMODES_SPEED`` u32 link speed (Mb/s)
> > ``ETHTOOL_A_LINKMODES_DUPLEX`` u8 duplex mode
> > + ``ETHTOOL_A_LINKMODES_MASTER_SLAVE_CFG`` u8 Master/slave port mode
> > ==================================== ====== ==========================
>
> Same table cleanup needed here.
>
> > +static int genphy_read_master_slave(struct phy_device *phydev)
> > +{
> > + int cfg, state = 0;
> > + u16 val;
> > +
> > + phydev->master_slave_get = 0;
> > + phydev->master_slave_state = 0;
>
> Could you use the _UNKNOWN #defined here?

ok

> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/ethtool.h b/include/uapi/linux/ethtool.h
> > index 92f737f101178..eb680e3d6bda5 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/ethtool.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/ethtool.h
> > @@ -1666,6 +1666,31 @@ static inline int ethtool_validate_duplex(__u8 duplex)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +static inline int ethtool_validate_master_slave_cfg(__u8 cfg)
> > +{
> > + switch (cfg) {
> > + case PORT_MODE_CFG_MASTER_PREFERRED:
> > + case PORT_MODE_CFG_SLAVE_PREFERRED:
> > + case PORT_MODE_CFG_MASTER_FORCE:
> > + case PORT_MODE_CFG_SLAVE_FORCE:
> > + case PORT_MODE_CFG_UNKNOWN:
> > + return 1;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
>
> Does this need to be an inline function?

Yes, otherwise we get a lot of "defined but not used " warnings.


Regards,
Oleksij
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-04-30 06:38    [W:1.531 / U:0.064 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site