Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 30 Apr 2020 17:34:44 +0200 | From | Jiri Olsa <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] perf data: if a bad header size, retry in pipe mode |
| |
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 07:12:49AM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote: > On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 7:01 AM Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 5:51 AM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 11:57:44AM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote: > > > > Currently pipe mode files fail like: > > > > $ perf record -o - sleep 1 > /tmp/perf.pipe.data > > > > $ perf report -i /tmp/perf.pipe.data > > > > incompatible file format (rerun with -v to learn more) > > > > > > > > This change makes it so that if a perf.data file's header size is wrong > > > > it is re-checked in pipe mode, where if wrong it fails as it currently > > > > does. > > > > > > > > > > hi, > > > how about doing it the other way round like below, > > > read header and find out if it's pipe.. > > > > > > seems it's less changes > > > > > > jirka > > > > Looks good to me. I think removing the function declaration from > > util/header.h is still worthwhile, but needn't be in a patch with this > > change. > > Hi Jiri, > > Do you need to send this patch?
ah right, will post, thanks for reminder
jirka
> > Thanks, > Ian > > > Thanks! > > Ian > > > > > --- > > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/header.c b/tools/perf/util/header.c > > > index acbd046bf95c..20c34cec9a46 100644 > > > --- a/tools/perf/util/header.c > > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/header.c > > > @@ -3469,7 +3469,7 @@ static int perf_header__read_pipe(struct perf_session *session) > > > return -EINVAL; > > > } > > > > > > - return 0; > > > + return f_header.size == sizeof(f_header) ? 0 : -1; > > > } > > > > > > static int read_attr(int fd, struct perf_header *ph, > > > @@ -3571,7 +3571,7 @@ int perf_session__read_header(struct perf_session *session) > > > struct perf_file_header f_header; > > > struct perf_file_attr f_attr; > > > u64 f_id; > > > - int nr_attrs, nr_ids, i, j; > > > + int nr_attrs, nr_ids, i, j, err; > > > int fd = perf_data__fd(data); > > > > > > session->evlist = evlist__new(); > > > @@ -3580,8 +3580,16 @@ int perf_session__read_header(struct perf_session *session) > > > > > > session->evlist->env = &header->env; > > > session->machines.host.env = &header->env; > > > - if (perf_data__is_pipe(data)) > > > - return perf_header__read_pipe(session); > > > + > > > + /* > > > + * We could still read 'pipe' data from regular file, > > > + * check for the pipe header first. > > > + */ > > > + err = perf_header__read_pipe(session); > > > + if (!err || (err && perf_data__is_pipe(data))) { > > > + data->is_pipe = true; > > > + return err; > > > + } > > > > > > if (perf_file_header__read(&f_header, header, fd) < 0) > > > return -EINVAL; > > > >
| |