lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Apr]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] rtw88: Use udelay instead of usleep in atomic context
Date
Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> writes:

>> On Apr 23, 2020, at 14:49, Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>>
>> Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> writes:
>>
>>> It's incorrect to use usleep in atomic context.
>>>
>>> Switch to a macro which uses udelay instead of usleep to prevent the issue.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
>>
>> This fixes a regression, right? So there should be a Fixes line.
>
> Yes, but the regression commit isn't in Linus' tree, so the sha1 may change.

No, the commit id won't change after I have commited the patch. I don't
rebase my trees.

--
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-04-23 09:02    [W:0.039 / U:4.444 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site