Messages in this thread | | | From | Kalle Valo <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] rtw88: Use udelay instead of usleep in atomic context | Date | Thu, 23 Apr 2020 10:01:03 +0300 |
| |
Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> writes:
>> On Apr 23, 2020, at 14:49, Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> wrote: >> >> Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> writes: >> >>> It's incorrect to use usleep in atomic context. >>> >>> Switch to a macro which uses udelay instead of usleep to prevent the issue. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> >> >> This fixes a regression, right? So there should be a Fixes line. > > Yes, but the regression commit isn't in Linus' tree, so the sha1 may change.
No, the commit id won't change after I have commited the patch. I don't rebase my trees.
-- https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
| |