lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Apr]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 3/5] arch/x86/mm: Refactor cond_ibpb() to support other use cases
From
Date
On Fri, 2020-04-17 at 15:07 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> Balbir Singh <sblbir@amazon.com> writes:
> >
> > /*
> > - * Use bit 0 to mangle the TIF_SPEC_IB state into the mm pointer which is
> > - * stored in cpu_tlb_state.last_user_mm_ibpb.
> > + * Bits to mangle the TIF_SPEC_IB state into the mm pointer which is
> > + * stored in cpu_tlb_state.last_user_mm_spec.
> > */
> > #define LAST_USER_MM_IBPB 0x1UL
> > +#define LAST_USER_MM_SPEC_MASK (LAST_USER_MM_IBPB)
> >
> > /* Reinitialize tlbstate. */
> > - this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate.last_user_mm_ibpb, LAST_USER_MM_IBPB);
> > + this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate.last_user_mm_spec, LAST_USER_MM_IBPB);
>
> Shouldn't that be LAST_USER_MM_MASK?
>
>

No, that crashes the system for SW flushes, because it tries to flush the L1D
via the software loop and early enough we don't have the l1d_flush_pages
allocated. LAST_USER_MM_MASK has LAST_USER_MM_FLUSH_L1D bit set.

Balbir Singh.
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-04-18 01:03    [W:0.127 / U:0.032 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site