lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Apr]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/8] bdi: add a ->dev_name field to struct backing_dev_info
On Thu 16-04-20 14:22:35, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 02:19:01PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 02:02:23PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > Yes, that can indeed happen. E.g. I remember that drivers/scsi/sd.c calls
> > > device_add_disk() + del_gendisk() repeatedly for one request_queue and that
> > > would result in leaking the name (and possibly cause use-after-free
> > > issues).
> >
> > Sd calls device_add_disk once in ->probe, and del_gendisk once in
> > sd_remove. Note that sd_probe allocates a new scsi_disk structure and
> > a new gendisk everytime, but it does indeed reuse the request_queue
> > and thus bdi.
> >
> > > I think dev_name has to be just a static array inside
> > > backing_dev_info which gets overwritten on reregistration. The question is
> > > how big should be this array... Some grepping shows that 40 bytes should be
> > > enough for everybody except fs/vboxsf/super.c which puts 'fc->source' into
> > > the name which can be presumably rather large. Anyway, I'd make it 40 and
> > > just truncate it case in case it does not fit. bdi_dev_name() is used for
> > > informational purposes anyway...
> >
> > We could just make it a variable sized array at the end of the structure
> > and size it based on the len.
>
> Which doesn't always work as the size might not always be the same.
> But I think the fundamental problem is that we are trying to re-register
> previous unregistered bdis. We really should not have bdi_alloc
> separate from bdi_register and solve this properly.

Yes, that would be easier then but it seems like a much larger change
because currently bdi is disassociated from request_queue only in
__blk_release_queue() (blk_exit_queue()). I guess the separate bdi
registration / deregistration is partially a leftover from times when bdi
was still embedded in request_queue but now it's difficult to undo it.

Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-04-16 14:33    [W:1.260 / U:0.612 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site