Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [RFC,PATCH 2/2] net: stmmac: Change the tx clean lock | From | David Wu <> | Date | Thu, 16 Apr 2020 18:46:02 +0800 |
| |
Hi Jose,
From the test I did, there will be some improvement, an improvement of tens Mbits/sec.
Before patch: # iperf -c 192.168.1.102 -i 1 -t 10 -w 300K -u -b 1000M ------------------------------------------------------------ Client connecting to 192.168.1.102, UDP port 5001 Sending 1470 byte datagrams, IPG target: 11.76 us (kalman adjust) UDP buffer size: 600 KByte (WARNING: requested 300 KByte) ------------------------------------------------------------ [ 3] local 192.168.1.103 port 45018 connected with 192.168.1.102 port 5001 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 3] 0.0- 1.0 sec 103 MBytes 862 Mbits/sec [ 3] 1.0- 2.0 sec 104 MBytes 868 Mbits/sec [ 3] 2.0- 3.0 sec 104 MBytes 869 Mbits/sec [ 3] 3.0- 4.0 sec 104 MBytes 869 Mbits/sec [ 3] 4.0- 5.0 sec 104 MBytes 870 Mbits/sec [ 3] 5.0- 6.0 sec 104 MBytes 869 Mbits/sec [ 3] 6.0- 7.0 sec 104 MBytes 869 Mbits/sec [ 3] 7.0- 8.0 sec 104 MBytes 870 Mbits/sec [ 3] 8.0- 9.0 sec 104 MBytes 871 Mbits/sec [ 3] 0.0-10.0 sec 1.01 GBytes 869 Mbits/sec [ 3] Sent 738834 datagrams
After patch: # iperf -c 192.168.1.102 -i 1 -t 10 -w 300K -u -b 1000M ------------------------------------------------------------ Client connecting to 192.168.1.102, UDP port 5001 Sending 1470 byte datagrams, IPG target: 11.76 us (kalman adjust) UDP buffer size: 600 KByte (WARNING: requested 300 KByte) ------------------------------------------------------------ [ 3] local 192.168.1.103 port 35654 connected with 192.168.1.102 port 5001 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 3] 0.0- 1.0 sec 114 MBytes 953 Mbits/sec [ 3] 1.0- 2.0 sec 114 MBytes 956 Mbits/sec [ 3] 2.0- 3.0 sec 115 MBytes 962 Mbits/sec [ 3] 3.0- 4.0 sec 114 MBytes 955 Mbits/sec [ 3] 4.0- 5.0 sec 114 MBytes 957 Mbits/sec [ 3] 5.0- 6.0 sec 114 MBytes 957 Mbits/sec [ 3] 6.0- 7.0 sec 114 MBytes 955 Mbits/sec [ 3] 7.0- 8.0 sec 114 MBytes 956 Mbits/sec [ 3] 8.0- 9.0 sec 114 MBytes 955 Mbits/sec [ 3] 0.0- 9.9 sec 1.10 GBytes 957 Mbits/sec [ 3] Sent 804442 datagrams
在 2020/4/13 下午10:31, Jose Abreu 写道: > From: David Wu <david.wu@rock-chips.com> > Date: Mar/24/2020, 09:38:28 (UTC+00:00) > >> At tx clean, use a frozen queue instead of blocking >> the current queue, could still queue skb, which improve >> performance. > > Please provide performance improvement numbers. > > --- > Thanks, > Jose Miguel Abreu > > > >
| |