Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 16 Apr 2020 11:34:28 +0300 | From | Dan Carpenter <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/gt: remove redundant assignment to variable x |
| |
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 12:07:44PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Tue, 14 Apr 2020, Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> wrote: > > Hi Dan, > > > > I'd post a revert, but I don't seem to see an upstream commit for this > > this to revert against. What's the revert policy in these cases? Or can > > the patch be just ignored by the maintainers so it's not applied? > > It has not been applied, and will be ignored, in part thanks to the > report. > > However I think Dan's report is misleading in that it looks like it's > about a commit while I think it should emphasize that it's a pre-merge > report on the patch on the mailing list. >
To be honest, these are auto-generated by the kbuild bot and I was a bit confused myself.
regards, dan carpenter
| |