lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Apr]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH V1 2/4] mmc: sdhci-msm: Enable MMC_CAP_NEED_RSP_BUSY host capability
From
Date
Hi Ulf,

On 4/16/2020 5:46 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Apr 2020 at 17:54, Veerabhadrarao Badiganti
> <vbadigan@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>> sdhci-msm controller requires the R1B response for commands that
>> has this response associated with them.
>>
>> So enable MMC_CAP_NEED_RSP_BUSY capability.
> I assume this potentially should be considered as fix and tagged for stable?
Yes Stable flag can be applied to this.

Patch with MMC_CAP_WAIT_WHILE_BUSY cap also needed besides this.
Shall I push V2 with stable flag?

> Another question, if there is there an upper limit of the busy timeout
> in the HW (cmd->busy_timeout) or does the driver use a software
> timeout that is adjustable?

The max supported h.w busy timeout value on qcom h/w 21sec.

> Kind regards
> Uffe
>
>> Signed-off-by: Veerabhadrarao Badiganti <vbadigan@codeaurora.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
>> index 013dcea..d826e9b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
>> @@ -2088,6 +2088,7 @@ static int sdhci_msm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> }
>>
>> msm_host->mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_WAIT_WHILE_BUSY;
>> + msm_host->mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_NEED_RSP_BUSY;
>>
>> pm_runtime_get_noresume(&pdev->dev);
>> pm_runtime_set_active(&pdev->dev);
>> --
>> Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc., is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-04-16 16:50    [W:0.073 / U:0.192 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site