lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Apr]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 1/2] iio: at91-sama5d2_adc: split at91_adc_current_chan_is_touch() helper
Date
On Tue, 2020-04-14 at 18:45 +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 12:22:45 +0000
> <Eugen.Hristev@microchip.com> wrote:
>
> > On 13.04.2020 20:05, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > > On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 10:42:18 +0200
> > > Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > This change moves the logic to check if the current channel is the
> > > > touchscreen channel to a separate helper.
> > > > This reduces some code duplication, but the main intent is to re-use
> > > > this
> > > > in the next patches.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>
> > > Eugen / Ludovic,
> > >
> > > Have you had a chance to look at this series?
> >
> > Hi Jonathan,
> >
> > Does the patch apply correctly for you ?
>
> I haven't tried yet :)
>

I've rebased this patchset on top of current iio/testing and it still applies.


> > I will try to test it , if I manage to apply it.
> > I can only test the ADC though because at this moment I do not have a
> > touchscreen at disposal.
> >
> > Meanwhile, the code looks good for me,
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@microchip.com>
> >
> > By the way, I do not know if my two pending patches on this driver will
> > conflict or not.
>
> As this is a long term rework patch at heart, there isn't any particular
> rush as long as we don't loose it forever!
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jonathan
>
> > Eugen
> >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Jonathan
> > >
> > > > ---
> > > >
> > > > This patchset continues discussion:
> > > >
> > > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20191023082508.17583-1-alexandru.ardelean@analog.com/__;!!A3Ni8CS0y2Y!ql1bYiNMPFlz1twnCCAQpiEBvpzxR_VHAPL712rWFfwy2TSKjZ2UhGBoV7-29Syny6z0yg$
> > > >
> > > > Apologies for the delay.
> > > >
> > > > Changelog v1 -> v2:
> > > > * added patch 'iio: at91-sama5d2_adc: split
> > > > at91_adc_current_chan_is_touch()
> > > > helper'
> > > > * renamed at91_adc_buffer_postenable() -> at91_adc_buffer_preenable()
> > > > - at91_adc_buffer_postenable() - now just calls
> > > > iio_triggered_buffer_postenable() if the channel isn't the
> > > > touchscreen
> > > > channel
> > > > * renamed at91_adc_buffer_predisable() -> at91_adc_buffer_postdisable()
> > > > - at91_adc_buffer_predisable() - now just calls
> > > > iio_triggered_buffer_predisable() if the channel isn't the
> > > > touchscreen
> > > > channel
> > > >
> > > > drivers/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.c | 31 +++++++++++++++---------------
> > > > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/at91-
> > > > sama5d2_adc.c
> > > > index a5c7771227d5..f2a74c47c768 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.c
> > > > @@ -873,18 +873,24 @@ static int at91_adc_dma_start(struct iio_dev
> > > > *indio_dev)
> > > > return 0;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > +static bool at91_adc_current_chan_is_touch(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct at91_adc_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> > > > +
> > > > + return !!bitmap_subset(indio_dev->active_scan_mask,
> > > > + &st->touch_st.channels_bitmask,
> > > > + AT91_SAMA5D2_MAX_CHAN_IDX + 1);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > static int at91_adc_buffer_postenable(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> > > > {
> > > > int ret;
> > > > struct at91_adc_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> > > >
> > > > /* check if we are enabling triggered buffer or the touchscreen
> > > > */
> > > > - if (bitmap_subset(indio_dev->active_scan_mask,
> > > > - &st->touch_st.channels_bitmask,
> > > > - AT91_SAMA5D2_MAX_CHAN_IDX + 1)) {
> > > > - /* touchscreen enabling */
> > > > + if (at91_adc_current_chan_is_touch(indio_dev))
> > > > return at91_adc_configure_touch(st, true);
> > > > - }
> > > > +
> > > > /* if we are not in triggered mode, we cannot enable the buffer.
> > > > */
> > > > if (!(indio_dev->currentmode & INDIO_ALL_TRIGGERED_MODES))
> > > > return -EINVAL;
> > > > @@ -906,12 +912,9 @@ static int at91_adc_buffer_predisable(struct
> > > > iio_dev *indio_dev)
> > > > u8 bit;
> > > >
> > > > /* check if we are disabling triggered buffer or the touchscreen
> > > > */
> > > > - if (bitmap_subset(indio_dev->active_scan_mask,
> > > > - &st->touch_st.channels_bitmask,
> > > > - AT91_SAMA5D2_MAX_CHAN_IDX + 1)) {
> > > > - /* touchscreen disable */
> > > > + if (at91_adc_current_chan_is_touch(indio_dev))
> > > > return at91_adc_configure_touch(st, false);
> > > > - }
> > > > +
> > > > /* if we are not in triggered mode, nothing to do here */
> > > > if (!(indio_dev->currentmode & INDIO_ALL_TRIGGERED_MODES))
> > > > return -EINVAL;
> > > > @@ -1886,14 +1889,10 @@ static __maybe_unused int at91_adc_resume(struct
> > > > device *dev)
> > > > return 0;
> > > >
> > > > /* check if we are enabling triggered buffer or the touchscreen
> > > > */
> > > > - if (bitmap_subset(indio_dev->active_scan_mask,
> > > > - &st->touch_st.channels_bitmask,
> > > > - AT91_SAMA5D2_MAX_CHAN_IDX + 1)) {
> > > > - /* touchscreen enabling */
> > > > + if (at91_adc_current_chan_is_touch(indio_dev))
> > > > return at91_adc_configure_touch(st, true);
> > > > - } else {
> > > > + else
> > > > return at91_adc_configure_trigger(st->trig, true);
> > > > - }
> > > >
> > > > /* not needed but more explicit */
> > > > return 0;
> > >
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-04-15 08:34    [W:0.221 / U:0.392 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site