lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Apr]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH tip/core/rcu 13/19] rcu: Get rid of some doc warnings in update.c
Date
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>

This commit escapes *ret, because otherwise the documentation system
thinks that this is an incomplete emphasis block:

./kernel/rcu/update.c:65: WARNING: Inline emphasis start-string without end-string.
./kernel/rcu/update.c:65: WARNING: Inline emphasis start-string without end-string.
./kernel/rcu/update.c:70: WARNING: Inline emphasis start-string without end-string.
./kernel/rcu/update.c:82: WARNING: Inline emphasis start-string without end-string.

Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
---
kernel/rcu/update.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/update.c b/kernel/rcu/update.c
index 28a8bdc..72461dd8 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/update.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/update.c
@@ -63,12 +63,12 @@ module_param(rcu_normal_after_boot, int, 0);
* rcu_read_lock_held_common() - might we be in RCU-sched read-side critical section?
* @ret: Best guess answer if lockdep cannot be relied on
*
- * Returns true if lockdep must be ignored, in which case *ret contains
+ * Returns true if lockdep must be ignored, in which case ``*ret`` contains
* the best guess described below. Otherwise returns false, in which
- * case *ret tells the caller nothing and the caller should instead
+ * case ``*ret`` tells the caller nothing and the caller should instead
* consult lockdep.
*
- * If CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC is selected, set *ret to nonzero iff in an
+ * If CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC is selected, set ``*ret`` to nonzero iff in an
* RCU-sched read-side critical section. In absence of
* CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC, this assumes we are in an RCU-sched read-side
* critical section unless it can prove otherwise. Note that disabling
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ module_param(rcu_normal_after_boot, int, 0);
*
* Note that if the CPU is in the idle loop from an RCU point of view (ie:
* that we are in the section between rcu_idle_enter() and rcu_idle_exit())
- * then rcu_read_lock_held() sets *ret to false even if the CPU did an
+ * then rcu_read_lock_held() sets ``*ret`` to false even if the CPU did an
* rcu_read_lock(). The reason for this is that RCU ignores CPUs that are
* in such a section, considering these as in extended quiescent state,
* so such a CPU is effectively never in an RCU read-side critical section
--
2.9.5
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-04-15 19:14    [W:0.104 / U:0.036 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site