lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Apr]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 2/9] mt76: remove unnecessary annotations
Date
Sparse report warnings at mt76_tx_status_unlock() and mt76_tx_status_lock()

warning: context imbalance in mt76_tx_status_lock() - wrong count at exit
warning: context imbalance in mt76_tx_status_unlock() - unexpected unlock

The root cause is the additional __acquire(&dev->status_list.lock)
and __release(&dev->status_list.unlock) called
from inside mt76_tx_status_lock() and mt76_tx_status_unlock().

Remove __acquire(&dev->status_list.lock) annotation
Remove __releases(&dev->status_list.unlock)
Correct &dev->status_list.unlock to &dev->status_list.lock
-unlock not defined in the sk_buff_head struct

Signed-off-by: Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@gmail.com>
---
drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/tx.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/tx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/tx.c
index 7ee91d946882..7581ba9c2e95 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/tx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/tx.c
@@ -101,18 +101,16 @@ mt76_tx_status_lock(struct mt76_dev *dev, struct sk_buff_head *list)
{
__skb_queue_head_init(list);
spin_lock_bh(&dev->status_list.lock);
- __acquire(&dev->status_list.lock);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mt76_tx_status_lock);

void
mt76_tx_status_unlock(struct mt76_dev *dev, struct sk_buff_head *list)
- __releases(&dev->status_list.unlock)
+ __releases(&dev->status_list.lock)
{
struct sk_buff *skb;

spin_unlock_bh(&dev->status_list.lock);
- __release(&dev->status_list.unlock);

while ((skb = __skb_dequeue(list)) != NULL)
ieee80211_tx_status(dev->hw, skb);
--
2.24.1
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-04-11 02:21    [W:0.294 / U:0.164 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site