lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Mar]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: [v3 05/10] mmap locking API: Improving the Coccinelle software
    From
    Date
    >> How will corresponding software development resources evolve?
    >
    > I don't think I understand the question, or, actually, are you asking
    > me or the coccinelle developers ?

    I hope that more development challenges will be picked up.

    The code from a mentioned source file can be reduced to the following
    test file.
    https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h?id=7111951b8d4973bda27ff663f2cf18b663d15b48#n122

    // deleted part
    static inline int FNAME(is_present_gpte)(unsigned long pte)
    {
    #if PTTYPE != PTTYPE_EPT
    return pte & PT_PRESENT_MASK;
    #else
    return pte & 7;
    #endif
    }
    // deleted part


    Application of the software “Coccinelle 1.0.8-00029-ga549b9f0” (OCaml 4.10.0)

    elfring@Sonne:~/Projekte/Coccinelle/Probe> spatch --parse-c paging_tmpl-excerpt1.h

    (ONCE) CPP-MACRO: found known macro = FNAME

    parse error
    = File "paging_tmpl-excerpt1.h", line 2, column 41, charpos = 57
    around = 'unsigned',

    BAD:!!!!! static inline int FNAME(is_present_gpte)(unsigned long pte)

    NB total files = 1; perfect = 0; pbs = 1; timeout = 0; =========> 0%
    nb good = 1, nb passed = 1 =========> 10.00% passed
    nb good = 1, nb bad = 8 =========> 20.00% good or passed


    How would you like to improve the affected software areas?

    Regards,
    Markus

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2020-03-30 08:13    [W:3.107 / U:0.200 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site