lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Mar]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
SubjectRe: [tip: sched/core] x86, sched: Add support for frequency invariance
Date

On Mon, Mar 30 2020, Chris Wilson wrote:
> <6> [184.949219] [IGT] perf_pmu: starting subtest cpu-hotplug
> <4> [185.092279] IRQ 24: no longer affine to CPU0
> <4> [185.092285] IRQ 25: no longer affine to CPU0
> <6> [185.093709] smpboot: CPU 0 is now offline
> <6> [186.107062] smpboot: Booting Node 0 Processor 0 APIC 0x0
> <3> [186.107643] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at ./include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:49
> <3> [186.107648] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, non_block: 0, pid: 0, name: swapper/0
> <4> [186.107650] no locks held by swapper/0/0.
> <4> [186.107652] irq event stamp: 6424624
> <4> [186.107658] hardirqs last enabled at (6424623): [<ffffffff951744bf>] tick_nohz_idle_enter+0x5f/0x90
> <4> [186.107664] hardirqs last disabled at (6424624): [<ffffffff950fa1e2>] do_idle+0x82/0x260
> <4> [186.107669] softirqs last enabled at (6424590): [<ffffffff95e00395>] __do_softirq+0x395/0x49e
> <4> [186.107674] softirqs last disabled at (6424571): [<ffffffff950c195a>] irq_exit+0xba/0xc0
> <3> [186.107677] Preemption disabled at:
> <4> [186.107681] [<ffffffff9504843b>] start_secondary+0x4b/0x1b0
> <4> [186.107685] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G U 5.6.0-rc7-next-20200327-g975f7a88c64d-next-20200327 #1
> <4> [186.107687] Hardware name: MSI MS-7924/Z97M-G43(MS-7924), BIOS V1.12 02/15/2016
> <4> [186.107688] Call Trace:
> <4> [186.107695] dump_stack+0x71/0x9b
> <4> [186.107702] ___might_sleep+0x178/0x260
> <4> [186.107708] cpus_read_lock+0x13/0xd0
> <4> [186.107713] static_key_enable+0x9/0x20
> <4> [186.107717] init_freq_invariance+0x1f0/0x3a0
> <4> [186.107724] start_secondary+0x71/0x1b0
> <4> [186.107729] secondary_startup_64+0xb6/0xc0
> <3> [186.107756] BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/0/0/0x00000002
> <4> [186.107763] 1 lock held by swapper/0/0:
> <4> [186.107767] #0: ffffffff9643e510 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: static_key_enable+0x9/0x20
> <4> [186.107775] Modules linked in: vgem snd_hda_codec_hdmi mei_hdcp i915 x86_pkg_temp_thermal coretemp snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_codec_generic crct10dif_pclmul snd_hda_intel crc32_pclmul snd_intel_dspcfg ghash_clmulni_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_hda_core r8169 lpc_ich snd_pcm mei_me mei realtek prime_numbers
> <3> [186.107797] Preemption disabled at:
> <4> [186.107800] [<ffffffff9504843b>] start_secondary+0x4b/0x1b0
> <4> [186.107803] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G U W 5.6.0-rc7-next-20200327-g975f7a88c64d-next-20200327 #1
> <4> [186.107805] Hardware name: MSI MS-7924/Z97M-G43(MS-7924), BIOS V1.12 02/15/2016
> <4> [186.107807] Call Trace:
> <4> [186.107811] dump_stack+0x71/0x9b
> <4> [186.107815] ? start_secondary+0x4b/0x1b0
> <4> [186.107819] __schedule_bug+0x7b/0xd0
> <4> [186.107825] __schedule+0x776/0x810
> <4> [186.107832] ? mark_held_locks+0x49/0x70
> <4> [186.107839] schedule+0x37/0xe0
> <4> [186.107843] ? percpu_rwsem_wait+0x117/0x180
> <4> [186.107846] percpu_rwsem_wait+0x117/0x180
> <4> [186.107851] ? percpu_down_write+0x140/0x140
> <4> [186.107859] __percpu_down_read+0x43/0x60
> <4> [186.107864] cpus_read_lock+0xc6/0xd0
> <4> [186.107867] static_key_enable+0x9/0x20
> <4> [186.107871] init_freq_invariance+0x1f0/0x3a0
> <4> [186.107878] start_secondary+0x71/0x1b0
> <4> [186.107883] secondary_startup_64+0xb6/0xc0
>
> repeating ad nauseam, e.g.
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/linux-next/next-20200327/shard-hsw4/dmesg9.txt
>
> Across all our test boxen.
> -Chris

AFAICT this should be valid (I'm afraid I can't easily test it,
however); init doesn't take the hp lock (doesn't need it) and post-boot
hotplug will call this via the hotplug state machine with the right lock
held.

---
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
index 467191e51196..7651b06a1036 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
@@ -2014,7 +2014,7 @@ static void init_freq_invariance(void)

if (ret) {
on_each_cpu(init_counter_refs, NULL, 1);
- static_branch_enable(&arch_scale_freq_key);
+ static_branch_enable_cpuslocked(&arch_scale_freq_key);
} else {
pr_debug("Couldn't determine max cpu frequency, necessary for scale-invariant accounting.\n");
}
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-03-30 13:31    [W:0.096 / U:0.704 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site