Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3] bpf: fix build warning - missing prototype | From | Daniel Borkmann <> | Date | Fri, 27 Mar 2020 21:34:05 +0100 |
| |
On 3/27/20 8:55 AM, Jean-Philippe Menil wrote: > Fix build warnings when building net/bpf/test_run.o with W=1 due > to missing prototype for bpf_fentry_test{1..6}. > > Instead of declaring prototypes, turn off warnings with > __diag_{push,ignore,pop} as pointed by Alexei. > > Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Menil <jpmenil@gmail.com>
Looks better, but this doesn't apply cleanly. Please respin to latest bpf-next tree, thanks.
> --- > net/bpf/test_run.c | 5 +++++ > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/net/bpf/test_run.c b/net/bpf/test_run.c > index d555c0d8657d..cc1592413fc3 100644 > --- a/net/bpf/test_run.c > +++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c > @@ -113,6 +113,9 @@ static int bpf_test_finish(const union bpf_attr *kattr, > * architecture dependent calling conventions. 7+ can be supported in the > * future. > */ > +__diag_push(); > +__diag_ignore(GCC, 8, "-Wmissing-prototypes", > + "Global functions as their definitions will be in vmlinux BTF); > int noinline bpf_fentry_test1(int a) > { > return a + 1; > @@ -143,6 +146,8 @@ int noinline bpf_fentry_test6(u64 a, void *b, short c, int d, void *e, u64 f) > return a + (long)b + c + d + (long)e + f; > } > > +__diag_pop(); > + > static void *bpf_test_init(const union bpf_attr *kattr, u32 size, > u32 headroom, u32 tailroom) > { >
| |