Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Wed, 25 Mar 2020 18:45:38 +0100 | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Subject | [PATCH v4 13/13] objtool: Also consider .entry.text as noinstr |
| |
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Consider all of .entry.text as noinstr. This gets us coverage across the PTI boundary. While we could add everything .noinstr.text into .entry.text that would bloat the amount of code in the user mapping.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> --- tools/objtool/check.c | 18 ++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--- a/tools/objtool/check.c +++ b/tools/objtool/check.c @@ -285,7 +285,8 @@ static int decode_instructions(struct ob strncmp(sec->name, ".discard.", 9)) sec->text = true; - if (!strcmp(sec->name, ".noinstr.text")) + if (!strcmp(sec->name, ".noinstr.text") || + !strcmp(sec->name, ".entry.text")) sec->noinstr = true; for (offset = 0; offset < sec->len; offset += insn->len) { @@ -2065,7 +2066,7 @@ static inline const char *call_dest_name static int validate_call(struct instruction *insn, struct insn_state *state) { if (state->noinstr && state->instr <= 0 && - (!insn->call_dest || insn->call_dest->sec != insn->sec)) { + (!insn->call_dest || !insn->call_dest->sec->noinstr)) { WARN_FUNC("call to %s() leaves .noinstr.text section", insn->sec, insn->offset, call_dest_name(insn)); return 1; @@ -2636,11 +2637,16 @@ static int validate_vmlinux_functions(st int warnings = 0; sec = find_section_by_name(file->elf, ".noinstr.text"); - if (!sec) - return 0; + if (sec) { + warnings += validate_section(file, sec); + warnings += validate_unwind_hints(file, sec); + } - warnings += validate_section(file, sec); - warnings += validate_unwind_hints(file, sec); + sec = find_section_by_name(file->elf, ".entry.text"); + if (sec) { + warnings += validate_section(file, sec); + warnings += validate_unwind_hints(file, sec); + } return warnings; }
| |